Most certainly, I think across the country the taxpayers want to know what is going on. I think that they look at the process that we have now where Members will submit requests, earmark requests, but those requests are only made public if their earmark is actually part of a bill that comes to the House. Now, under this new procedure that has been announced by the majority, those earmark letters, which indicate who the earmark is to go to, won't be made public at all until it's too late in the process to actually challenge that earmark. So it means little to go through the process that we have set up if, by the time it has any effect, it's too late in the process to change. So the gentleman is correct, I think. Across the country, that's what I hear when I am out there. People want to know. They want open government. When you think about it, every second that this Chamber is in session is captured on C-SPAN, this conversation and every other conversation, whenever this body is in session. When we are in committee, every word that is said is transcribed and is captured. So we have an open process. Yet when it comes to spending money, we have a very secretive process in terms of earmarks, where, according to the majority this year, we won't know it all until it's too late to actually change it, until we have to just do one up and down, up or down vote on a bill.
Jeff Flake: “Most certainly, I think across the country the taxpayers want to know what is going on. I think that they look at the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of transparency in the earmark process during a House debate.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
They have pushed back against Soviet--Russian aggression in Ukraine and with Georgia.
to conclude, I thank my colleagues for their kind words. I thank them for taking their jobs seriously and that they would continue to do this. I say to our President: This is not a witch hunt. Russia attempted to interfere in our…
It has, and that's the tragic legacy of the Trump years, the normalization of -- I mean, accepting of falsehoods, trafficking in conspiracy theories.
We can't vote for Trump because four more years of him, we won't have a Republican Party that's op-ed. It's four years too late. The Republican Party has to pay for this along with Trump.





