what I was offered about 30 minutes ago was an opportunity to offer perhaps a few amendments with regard to specific earmarks. It was never clear how many amendments I would be allowed to offer or on which of these earmarks. Until that is clarified, there is no reason to move forward. And, also, let me point out again unless you are in secret session, you can't discuss exactly what the earmark might be about; so you might run afoul of any statements that you have signed or any confidentiality agreements that we are under in terms of classified information. And when I actually went up with the list to look at the classified annex again and pointed at certain earmarks, I was told that we are not sure what that was about. That was requested by a Member who is not on the committee. We don't know. And until we can have that Member actually stand up and be able to say what that earmark is about, whether it goes to a private company, whether it goes to an agency, we just don't know.
Jeff Flake: “what I was offered about 30 minutes ago was an opportunity to offer perhaps a few amendments with regard to specific…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the lack of clarity regarding earmarks and amendments during a legislative session.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
No doubt. No doubt. The president has particular, you know, sway over Republican voters, that subset of a subset that controls primaries.
the alarm among Republicans in the Senate privately is palpable. They feel the President may be able to navigate issues like the peaceful transfer of power, Proud Boys, white supremacy, and somehow through relentlessness and shamelessness…
I wish to begin by noting that had the people of Arizona and America been truly lucky, my mother or father would have served in the U.S. House of Representatives and in the Senate. Everything I know about what matters most in life I…
These CAATSA sanctions will not be lifted until they have disposed of the current system they have.





