I wonder if they understand that the reason that we do not ask for birth certificates, and we have not since 1982, has been that the Supreme Court, in the decision of Plyer versus Doe, they said that all children have the right to a public education regardless of the status of their parents. So that is the law of the land today. I think the Supreme Court, in their judgment, looked at that law for social reasons. They knew that throughout the years, in the past and in the future, we are going to have immigrants, legal and unlegal, in this country. And rather than have an underclass of uneducated residents, that it was in good social policy that we educate them, because they will become, whether we like it or not, the work force of the future. We would want them to be competitive in this country. So we are obeying the law, Mr. Chairman. We are obeying the law of 1982, as set down by the Supreme Court.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on education rights for children of immigrants.
Share
More from Ed Pastor
when I first came to this Congress in October of 1991, I was approached about trying to do something with this issue. I have to tell Members since then to today, things have gotten worse for the people not only who are in Germany but also…
I started with that: this is a political process. I think every administration does it.
I represent the urban areas of Arizona, Phoenix, Tucson, and these areas are surrounded by Indian reservations, and because the economic opportunities on many of these reservations are very poor, lack of jobs, lack of opportunities, many…
Mr. Chairman, they tell me that reasonable men will differ, and being reasonable, I am sure that we will have some differences. I do, but first before I point out the differences, I would like to also commend the gentleman from Florida…





