We need to have these discussions, make sure we are designing optionality and flexibility.
David Schweikert: “We need to have these discussions, make sure we are designing optionality and flexibility.”
Editor's note · Context
Schweikert calls for flexible regulatory approaches in light of evolving scientific understanding.
Share
More from David Schweikert
I actually think we should first jump into the fact that we work in a math-free zone. If you listen to the people coming behind the microphones, particularly today, it is as if they have read none of the CBO reports, none of the HHS…
wouldn't it be fun if we actually did these sorts of discussions and debates sort of like we do term papers where you actually have to give the footnote of where the numbers come from. That is because I hear numbers from my brothers and…
Let's save America. Let's protect our elections. I will give you one last concept, being someone from Arizona. How do you protect a republic if your citizens don't trust the institutions and don't trust elections? So even if you are…
Yeah. Your life is hell. I do Joint Economic Committee and Ways and Means. That is actually one of the elegance the Founding Fathers gave us is, we eventually end up where we are good. In some ways, I always loved the yin and yang thing…





