Simply slapping a 'nonattainment' designation on areas where ozone emissions are not even originating is both unfair and devastating to business in the state.
Editor's note · Context
Biggs criticizes the unfairness of nonattainment designations for ozone.
Share
More from Andy Biggs
Let's just address the previous speaker first of all. We already have a 60-day legislative lookback in the law. We are not changing that. That is apparently an objection that my colleague had. We already have in the law that a…
Here we go, Mr. Speaker. We are going to walk around the barn one more time. Let's go around that barn just one more time and say the same thing again. My colleague and I are obviously diametrically opposed. He thinks that if this bill…
“There’s not a doubt in my mind, if you look at the polling data that you’re going to find, I am the most competitive with Katie Hobbs of anybody on this stage in any Republican in the state,”
The Fourth Amendment is clear: the government must obtain a warrant before searching Americans' communications or personal data.





