On the recordJuly 13, 2022
The gentleman has already yielded his time and now wishes to take my time to explain. The reality is he knows. This bill, or his amendment needs to go back for regular order for additional debate to determine all the consequences so when legal conduct produces or adduces evidence of smuggling or trafficking. That is why I oppose this amendment. I urge my colleagues to do the same, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 1224, the previous question is ordered on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Schiff). The question is on the amendment. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
