Why else might we want to eliminate this program? The provision of free food to these seven nations on this list, which is required to be delivered in a not-so-timely manner on U.S.-flagged ships, distorts food production markets in those nations receiving aid, and it actually increases the cost. It is a classic ``give a man a fish, feed him for a day'' problem. The program isn't eliminating food insecurity. It is slow. It is costly. It is growing. It pushes out local production. Quite frankly, we simply can't afford it anymore. At some point, we are going to have to say we are having trouble funding everything in our own country, and now we are going to send it abroad. That is something I don't think the American people stand for. Mr. Chair, I urge the adoption of this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Andy Biggs: “Why else might we want to eliminate this program? The provision of free food to these seven nations on this list, which…”
Share
More from Andy Biggs
This is really humorous to hear the machinations and the twisting and goings-on from our friends across the aisle. As they say, this is too much. Mr. Schumer denigrated Black people and basically said they can't get the IDs. Kamala Harris…
I introduced legislation in Congress to bring down healthcare costs and also voiced support for Trump’s proposal to send money directly to Americans for health savings accounts so they can handle insurance and health costs as they see fit.
I am deeply honored to be chosen by Arizona Republicans as their nominee to defeat Katie Hobbs in November.
In my State, which is the sixth largest geographically in the Nation, only 18 percent of the land is privately owned. All of the rest, 82 percent, is controlled by a government entity, State, Federal, or reservation. My amendment is common…





