On the recordDecember 14, 2021
I am not asking for an advisory opinion. I am asking what you took into account with the Parliamentarian to determine that his words were nonparliamentary. That is what I am asking. And I have given you context and relationship of previous actions, and I have asked for specifically how you limited the speech and debate clause here, and whether the fact that he has documentation to prove his assertions or not or whether they are relevant. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair relied on section 370 of the House Rules and Manual as stated in the ruling.
