On the recordMarch 16, 2010
I'm not clear that that intent is reflected in its sometimes warring provisions.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Pryor expresses confusion over conflicting provisions in the Dodd bill.
Share
More from Mark Pryor
Dec 11, 2014
I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of H.R. 4771, and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk…
Dec 16, 2014
I ask unanimous consent that the committee-reported amendments be considered; that the Johnson amendment relative to S. 684 and the Barrasso amendment relative to S. 1800, which are at the desk, be agreed to; that the committee-reported…
Dec 11, 2014
I further ask unanimous consent that the bill be read three times and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so…
Dec 16, 2014
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 648, S. Res. 595. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the resolution by title. The assistant legislative clerk read as follows: A…
Other voices in this conversation
