What I would like to ask all the panelists is: Is that good public policy? Or, what's wrong with that policy of allowing the signal to stay on the system when there's a breakdown in negotiation?
Mark Pryor: “What I would like to ask all the panelists is: Is that good public policy? Or, what's wrong with that policy of allowing…”
Editor's note · Context
Pryor questions the public policy implications of maintaining signal during negotiation breakdowns.
Share
More from Mark Pryor
If there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous order. There being no objection, the Senate, at 10:31 p.m., conditionally adjourned until Monday, September 22, 2014, at…
If there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous order. There being no objection, the Senate, at 11:15 p.m., adjourned until Friday, August 1, 2014, at 11 a.m.
If there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask unanimous consent that it adjourn under the previous order. There being no objection, the Senate, at 11:30 p.m., adjourned until Friday, December 12, 2014, at 10 a.m…





