I ask my colleagues to look at my amendment. It reduces discretionary spending caps by $77 billion relative to President Obama's budget in 2011, 2012, and 2013. It also requires the fiscal commission to find an additional $77 billion to reduce the deficit. It moves the vote from 67 back to 60, as it is under our normal Senate rules. It also increases the chances of a bipartisan agreement on deficit reduction. We need that around here. We need a bipartisan agreement on deficit reduction. This reduction could potentially add $13 billion more in deficit reduction than what the Sessions-McCaskill amendment does. As much as I respect and appreciate all the work Senators Sessions and McCaskill did, I certainly would appreciate people voting for the Pryor amendment.
Mark Pryor: “I ask my colleagues to look at my amendment. It reduces discretionary spending caps by $77 billion relative to President…”
Editor's note · Context
Senator Pryor discusses his amendment aimed at reducing discretionary spending and promoting bipartisan deficit reduction.
Share
More from Mark Pryor
I do not do very many press conferences, as you all know, and I have always been first in line to work with any and all of my colleagues to try to get things done. The Senate is a special place. On a personal level, we talk about the…
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. 599, submitted earlier today. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the resolution by title. The assistant legislative clerk read as follows: A…
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 608, S. 2338. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The assistant legislative clerk read as follows: A bill (S. 2338)…
For the information of all Senators, if all debate time is used, there will be up to four rollcall votes in relation to the Defense authorization bill and the Saperstein nomination at 3 p.m. We hope to yield back some of the debate time…





