I can understand how that would drive the cost, but not to $71 million.
Mark Pryor: “I can understand how that would drive the cost, but not to $71 million.”
Editor's note · Context
Senator Pryor expresses disbelief at the $71 million cost.
Share
More from Mark Pryor
I know of no further debate on this measure. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the concurrent resolution. The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 125) was agreed to, as follows: H. Con Res. 125 Resolved by the House of…
I further ask unanimous consent that the bill be read three times and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so…
I ask unanimous consent that the bill be read a third time and passed and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered…
I ask unanimous consent that the action of the Senate with respect to discharging PN Nos. 2065, 1279, 1280, and 1916 from the HELP and EPW Committees be vitiated. For the information of the Senate, these nominations were on the calendar on…





