despite objections raised from many corners, the FCC has charged ahead with plans to immediately implement low-power FM. In the process it has ignored legitimate concerns about interference and the continued viability of small and independent commercial stations and existing public stations. H.R. 3439, the Radio Broadcasting Preservation Act, pulls the FCC back from the edge without completely halting its authority to pursue low-power FM. The potential for interference has been a primary concern from the beginning. The available spectrum only stretches so far. While the FCC claims its plan will not cause interference on car radios and high-fidelity stereo component systems, it does admit some interference will occur on clock radios and portable radios like the boombox and walkman. Considering these types of radios account for 65 percent of all radios in America, it makes sense that we should step back, take a breath and carefully consider all the consequences before taking drastic actions. We must also ensure that in its haste to implement low-power FM, the FCC does not overlook the impact on inexpensive and older radios, which are highly vulnerable to interference and are most commonly used by low-income and elderly individuals. H.R. 3439, therefore, requires a test of nine markets be conducted by an independent third party to determine how low-power FM without third-adjacent channel protections would affect current listening audiences.
Jay Dickey: “despite objections raised from many corners, the FCC has charged ahead with plans to immediately implement low-power FM.…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the FCC's implementation of low-power FM and its impact on radio interference.
Share
More from Jay Dickey
I represent the Fourth District of Arkansas, the district that includes Hope and Hot Springs, the birthplace and the boyhood of President Bill Clinton
I have four children. All of them are boys, except for two. It is ``except for two'' that bothers me now, even though they are of age. They are grown. Laura and Rachel are very fine, well-adjusted kids, and I am thankful for this. Their…
I understand you are saying I am heartless, and you know better than that. What I am trying to say, what I want the question to be answered is, why not encourage these people to improve rather than to say this minimum is the maximum? Why…
in 1995, when I was fortunate enough to get on this committee, I asked what subcommittees I would be on and one was called the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education. I asked people about that committee, and they…





