Today legislation has been introduced to eliminate fraud in the child disability portion of the supplemental security income program. A 1990 Supreme Court decision so broadened the definition of disability as it relates to SSI that it is easy for children who merely act disabled to receive SSI payments. In my home State of Arkansas, many allegations have arisen that some parents encourage their otherwise healthy children to act mentally disabled in classroom settings to qualify for these SSI cash payments. Straight cash payments are a strong incentive to coach a child to act disabled. Benefits average $400 per month per child, and parents are not required to use the money to cover the medical costs of the child. Think what this is doing for the child and the children, and you can readily see part of what lasting harm this is inflicting. This bill, if adopted, would replace cash benefits with medical vouchers for children under 18 who qualify for SSI which parents can use to cover the costs of medical and therapeutic aid for their child, allow children to continue receiving the care they need, but discourage parents from taking advantage of the system.
Jay Dickey: “Today legislation has been introduced to eliminate fraud in the child disability portion of the supplemental security…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing legislation to address fraud in the child disability portion of the SSI program.
Share
More from Jay Dickey
What we have now, though, is an enemy, not something that is tangible, but something that we are faced with and we might get into, and that is indulgent spending. Our Nation is spending money, this Congress is spending money, that we do…
I would like to state that he is to be commended for the work that he has done, the outstanding efforts and hard work in bringing this bill to the floor, and during that time, for being such a shock absorber for the media criticism that he…
Now what we have is one last plea on my part on behalf of the black farmers. My statement of January 8 was we cannot proceed any further without my colleagues in Congress being supportive of this effort. If we vote this concurrent…
Would that provision in this bill direct the Corps to use the funds provided in fiscal year 1997 to begin construction of a diversion channel, or at least to begin moving dirt?





