I appreciate the intentions of the sponsor, but I believe we need to carefully consider some of the details. This amendment nearly duplicates the vast powers of the Defense Production Act while the House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking Committee are in the midst of a thorough reauthorization, including happily and proactively consulting with our colleagues on the Armed Services Committee and our Members throughout both sides of the Hill. Note that I said the amendment narrowly duplicates the DPA because there are significant differences that should raise concerns about the text in this amendment. Over the course of 75 years, Congress has built in crucial safeguards to the Defense Production Act. The amendment does not include these safeguards.
James Hill: “I appreciate the intentions of the sponsor, but I believe we need to carefully consider some of the details. This…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about an amendment related to the Defense Production Act during a House floor debate.
Share
More from James Hill
Additionally, this program would build upon the previous success that the Arkansas delegation achieved in the last Congress for the White River Basin Comprehensive Study. I urge a ``yes'' vote.
I rise in condolence to Jill LaMalfa and the LaMalfa family of northern California, that beautiful area north of Sacramento, deep in the wilderness, home to Mt. Shasta. There was no better representation of the people of California than…
I would like to inquire of my good friend from California if she has any other speakers. I am prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, America is not a surveillance state, and under Republican leadership, it never will be. Today, this Congress has the opportunity to lay the foundation for a digital future that protects freedom and financial privacy. At the…





