I want to ask the Senator, No. 1, if the Senators in this body do not have the courage to cut spending and balance the budget now, and you put this in the Constitution, and there is absolutely nothing and no way to enforce it, because you are taking the courts out of it, what is it in this amendment that is going to change the courage of the Members of the Senate to balance the budget? That is the first question. The second question: If we wind up in the middle of the year seeing that either we have grossly overestimated revenues, or grossly underestimated spending and that we are therefore headed for an unbalanced budget--but the Senator cannot get 60 Senators to waive the budget. I want the Senator to tell me what would he do in each of these cases.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is questioning the effectiveness of a proposed constitutional amendment on balancing the budget.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
I rise in support of S. 540, the Bankruptcy Reform bill, and ask that the following remarks pertaining to section 208 of the bill be included in the Record. A few years ago, some failing SBIC's discovered they could thwart the Small…
The Levin amendment prohibits a gift of any kind from a lobbyist. It limits gifts from others to a $20 value, with the exceptions which I am sure the Senator has seen. I am saying: Do not just make it for lobbyists; make it for anybody…
Well, let us assume somebody brings in a bottle of wine to my office that costs 20 bucks and then bring in a bottle every day. Does the $250 limitation kick in after the 12th bottle is brought in?
Senator, I think that in the case of your beloved daughter, you would be quite secure if she came home with a gift of almost any value--well, I will not say that--but of nominal value, say, $20. You could be secure in that because there is…





