But the point that must not be lost sight of is we are not imposing anything. We are simply saying to the States, if you choose to do this, it is your prerogative. If you do not, that is also your prerogative. But we are also saying that if you do not have a sales tax in your State, you cannot charge it. There are five States in this country that have no sales tax. This bill would not apply to them. They would not be able to charge this because they do not have a tax that they tax their own citizens with, and therefore they could not tax citizens of other States.
Dale Bumpers: “But the point that must not be lost sight of is we are not imposing anything. We are simply saying to the States, if you…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to state sales tax during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
I would like to note the importance of coordinating the research agenda for the food program studies and evaluations between USDA's research and nutrition subcabinet officers. I cannot understate the importance of these two branches of…
I offered this amendment in 1984 when Charles Wick, head of the United States Information Agency, said that he had taped 84 phone calls, including Reagan, Cabinet Members, President Carter. I offered it then, and I got 41 votes. I offered…
I noticed there was no prompt response on that side of the aisle to a request for the yeas and nays, so I assumed some sort of cabal was in the works.
The administration has raised very serious objections to the Murkowski amendment.





