Were we to follow the Senator's logic to its logical conclusion, would this not be a fair summary, that it costs millions of dollars to develop land belonging to the United States but nothing to develop lands that belong to private interests?
Dale Bumpers: “Were we to follow the Senator's logic to its logical conclusion, would this not be a fair summary, that it costs…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the economic implications of land development policies during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
the administration has raised very serious objections to the Murkowski amendment.
I first brought this issue to the Senate's attention in 1984 when it was determined that Charles Wick, who at that time was head of the U.S. Information Agency, had been tape recording conversations with just about everybody he talked to…
when Senator Cochran and I reported the fiscal year 1999 appropriations bill for agriculture, rural development and related agencies to the Senate earlier this year, our recommendation included maintaining the studies and evaluations…
Bill Clinton, my friend from my home State of Arkansas, has been taking a lot of trashing lately, a lot of it richly deserved. I am not here to defend the President. But I will tell you one thing. You can say a lot of things about him but…





