If I may continue on what the Senator from Ohio was saying, I am not a signatory to the contract. I was not asked to sign it, and, of course, would not have signed it had I been asked. It does not apply to me. What applies to me is to do what I think is best for the country and to make certain that these bills are not rammed through here before people who have legitimate interest in them, and who want to improve them, have an opportunity to do so. I have never seen a time when the Senate, for the most part, was not better served when it slowed things down and forced the Members of this body to think about it, rather than to do what was political. Last night, the senior Senator from Maine came over and said, first of all, he did not know I was going to bring the amendment up. He said he was at home and did not know it was coming up. Let me say to the Senator from Maine and everybody else, I am not in the habit of calling people, particularly people I think are going to be opposed to my amendments, to tell them when I am going to bring up an amendment.
Dale Bumpers: “If I may continue on what the Senator from Ohio was saying, I am not a signatory to the contract. I was not asked to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legislative process and the importance of thorough debate in the Senate.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
my colleagues will be greatly relieved with my departure at the end of this year because they won't have to listen to this debate anymore. They may have to listen to it again, but not from me. This amendment arises from a situation which…
I first brought this issue to the Senate's attention in 1984 when it was determined that Charles Wick, who at that time was head of the U.S. Information Agency, had been tape recording conversations with just about everybody he talked to…
when Senator Cochran and I reported the fiscal year 1999 appropriations bill for agriculture, rural development and related agencies to the Senate earlier this year, our recommendation included maintaining the studies and evaluations…
But I also understand the Federal share of that will be somewhere between 87 and 94 percent. You think with that kind of money and what you can do--if you just take the Federal share, cut Alaska out, take the 87 percent of whatever it is…





