Political Quotes

Dale Bumpers: If 601 hours was the right number of preproduction tests last year, why is 183 hours the right number this year? This…

On the recordJune 25, 1998
If 601 hours was the right number of preproduction tests last year, why is 183 hours the right number this year? This chart shows the preproduction flight hours here. Those planes were tested this amount: 975 hours for the F-15; 1,115 hours for the F-16; and 1,418 hours for the F-18-- preproduction hours. And what are we going to do for the F-22? 183. And let me repeat, when you talk about how much more this is going to cost, $3 or $4 billion more, if we do not do this--you tell me, what if the Secretary does not wait? They still have to test 433 hours, and presumably you are going to get into the same cost figures of a $3 to $4 billion cost overrun. And while I am at it, let me ask the Air Force and Lockheed Martin this question: If you did not know, if they did not know that this committee, the Armed Services Committee--if they did not know that the required test hours were going to be cut from 600 to 183, why did they make those commitments that would generate a $3 to $4 billion cost overrun? Why are we responsible for the cost overrun that they have incurred--not us--they? Oh, Mr. President, it is so frustrating.
Said by
Dale Bumpers
Arkansas

Editor's note · Context

Questioning the reduction in preproduction test hours for military aircraft during Senate floor debate.

Share

More from Dale Bumpers

Sep 15, 1998

since I have been in the Senate, I have come to the floor--and I would not want to miss my last opportunity before I leave the Senate--to express my strong, strong support of the National Endowment for the Arts. We talk a lot in this…

govinfo.gov
Jul 16, 1998

Let me again echo the very eloquent words of the chairman, and for the purposes of the Record state this has been sort of a festering sore down at the Department of Agriculture for some time. I know the President is personally--very…

govinfo.gov
Sep 28, 1998

Senator Graham and I are going to offer this amendment, if we get a chance, on this bill. What brought all of this about? Well, first of all, it was about 1967, the Supreme Court, in a decision commonly referred to as the National Bellas…

govinfo.gov
Jul 22, 1998

This is the amendment that Senator Hatch and I agreed to this morning which would modify the grand jury amendment that I lost. This morning, Senator Hatch and I agreed to a plan that recommended that the issue be submitted to the Judicial…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation