Mr. President I want to congratulate my distinguished colleague from Iowa for a very sensible amendment, one that ought to receive the unanimous approval of this body. This budget contains just over $500 billion in discretionary spending. I want my colleagues to think about this for a moment. We are looking at a total budget of between $1.6 trillion and $1.7 trillion and only a bit over $500 billion of that is for discretionary spending. Under this budget, about $265 billion of that is for defense. That does not leave much for programs that go to the very heart of the values of the country and the things that really make this Nation strong, like education and transportation. I can tell you that the number of explosions you can set off with weaponry is not necessarily related to the real strength of this Nation. I am always nonplused and puzzled when so many people jump under their desks every time somebody mentions cutting defense. You can savage education, which this budget does, you can savage the environment, which this budget does, you can savage the programs that people depend on for their very livelihood, earned-income tax credits, and on and on it goes, you can deal with those programs and you can ask for a whopping tax increase for the wealthiest among us, but if you ask defense to take one single dollar less, everybody goes berserk.
Dale Bumpers: “Mr. President I want to congratulate my distinguished colleague from Iowa for a very sensible amendment, one that ought…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the budget on discretionary spending and its implications for education and social programs.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
Senator Graham and I are going to offer this amendment, if we get a chance, on this bill. What brought all of this about? Well, first of all, it was about 1967, the Supreme Court, in a decision commonly referred to as the National Bellas…
But I also understand the Federal share of that will be somewhere between 87 and 94 percent. You think with that kind of money and what you can do--if you just take the Federal share, cut Alaska out, take the 87 percent of whatever it is…
The reason there is an objection is because the Senator from New Hampshire and the Senator from Oregon do not come from the 45 States that have sales taxes. They are opposed to this because their State is not one of the 45 States that do…
Yes, I am. I understand the North Dakota program, developed through the Red River Water Management Consortium (RRWMC) is doing important work to help understand the occurrence, transport, and fate of agricultural chemicals in the Northern…





