So gifts having a value of less than $20 from the same or different sources on a basis so frequent that a reasonable person is led to believe the Member or officer or employee is using the public office for private gain. Let me go back up to the second sentence--``the same or different sources.'' What if 20 different people who do not even know each other just happen to leave a bottle of wine in my office on, say, five different occasions. That is 100 bottles of wine, but not one of those people know the other or know that the other has left a bottle of wine in my office on that same day, because this says $20 from the same or different sources. And then it goes on to say on a basis so frequent that a reasonable person--I know the Senator from Michigan is a lawyer, I am a lawyer, and we always know that the reasonable-man rule is a jury determination; correct?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of gift regulations for public officials.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
That is much simpler, and I have not laid a minefield for myself. I am not going to be criticized for receiving $20, which somebody might do under the case I just gave you.
I, first of all, express my sincere admiration and respect to the distinguished Senator from Virginia for having labored in the vineyards for a very long time in an effort to get the Shenandoah Valley battlefields the national designation…
So if someone wants to give me a $20 bottle of wine every day 365 days a year that is not a violation?
As I have said, and this sounds a little self-serving, but I say it again, in the 19-plus years I have been in the Senate, that is the only time, about 9 o'clock that evening, on the Manassas battlefield bill that Senators have actually…





