Senator, let us get back to my amendment. Can you quarrel with the premise of this amendment, which says that, under your provision, I am going to have to be very careful to keep a value of a gift under $20? As I say, that is tough enough under $100. It is simply not worth it for $20. And in order to keep from laying the minefields that the Senator from Kentucky alluded to yesterday, which is my principal objection to this, in order to alleviate that problem and eliminate those minefields, everybody in the United States Senate can understand that he or she is not to accept a gift, period. Now why is that not an easier determination than whether it is worth $19.95 or $20.05?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the acceptance of gifts in the Senate.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
Senator, I think that in the case of your beloved daughter, you would be quite secure if she came home with a gift of almost any value--well, I will not say that--but of nominal value, say, $20. You could be secure in that because there is…
The Levin amendment prohibits a gift of any kind from a lobbyist. It limits gifts from others to a $20 value, with the exceptions which I am sure the Senator has seen. I am saying: Do not just make it for lobbyists; make it for anybody…
It is better than asking the man the value of this cap or T-shirt, whatever it is. T-shirts are much more expensive than I dreamed of these days. I tried to buy one a couple of weeks ago and it was $15. But you can say in a nice, discrete…
Is the Senator telling me that staff members, wives and spouses and dependents are not affected by this?





