Senator, let us get back to my amendment. Can you quarrel with the premise of this amendment, which says that, under your provision, I am going to have to be very careful to keep a value of a gift under $20? As I say, that is tough enough under $100. It is simply not worth it for $20. And in order to keep from laying the minefields that the Senator from Kentucky alluded to yesterday, which is my principal objection to this, in order to alleviate that problem and eliminate those minefields, everybody in the United States Senate can understand that he or she is not to accept a gift, period. Now why is that not an easier determination than whether it is worth $19.95 or $20.05?
Dale Bumpers: “Senator, let us get back to my amendment. Can you quarrel with the premise of this amendment, which says that, under…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the acceptance of gifts in the Senate.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
I want to suggest to each Senator that they meditate on this proposition. The doorbell rings and the Senator's wife answers the door. There is a nicely dressed person, in a suit and tie, standing at the door. He hands her a paper, and she…
I must say, his determination--his fierce determination--to get this bill passed was reflected in the fact that he asked me every day for 6 months when I was going to take my hold off. This morning, I was very happy to tell him that my…
I came over to express my very strong support for campaign finance reform. From the time I ran for Governor in 1970 until 28 years later--this very moment--I have abhorred the system of financing campaigns in this country. One of the…
This says exactly what I have been saying, and that is, the President ought to veto the Interior Appropriations bill if my amendment is defeated. And I personally think he will. With all these disasters which I have addressed, all we have…





