the pending second-degree amendment caps the fee paid by the utilities for nuclear waste disposal services. That sounds simple enough, but to understand the amendment we must first understand the funding provisions in both the Murkowski substitute, which the pending amendment amends, and how both will affect the nuclear waste program's current funding mechanism. One of the fundamental principles of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 is that the full cost of disposing of nuclear waste should be borne by the waste's generators. In the case of the military waste, that means the Treasury and the taxpayers. In the case of commercial power plant waste, that means the utilities and their ratepayers. The existing nuclear waste program will cost about $34 billion. Of this amount, the utilities are responsible for $27 billion and the defense program is responsible for $7 billion. Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the utilities' share is recovered through a fee on electricity generated by nuclear power. The 1982 law set the fee at 1 mill, which is one tenth of a cent, per kilowatt-hour. Congress assumed in 1982 that the fee would need to be adjusted from time to time for inflation, to meet higher than expected costs, of if the number of plants paying the fee changed. Thus, the existing law gives the Secretary of Energy the power to adjust the fee. The Secretary has never used his adjustment authority.
Dale Bumpers: “the pending second-degree amendment caps the fee paid by the utilities for nuclear waste disposal services. That sounds…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to nuclear waste disposal fees.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
here is what the new regulations contain: Regulations to minimize adverse environmental impacts, if economically and technically feasible--that is a pretty big loophole; that is what these new regulations provide--reclaim the land to its…
the administration has raised very serious objections to the Murkowski amendment.
when Senator Cochran and I reported the fiscal year 1999 appropriations bill for agriculture, rural development and related agencies to the Senate earlier this year, our recommendation included maintaining the studies and evaluations…
I want to lead off with one of Mo Udall's great statements: Everything that needs to be said has been said but everybody hasn't said it. So I want to get my two cents in before we vote on this measure this afternoon. A moment ago, I said…





