With regard to the payment to the State of Montana, there is a provision in this bill--and I will not read the whole provision--but it says essentially that not later than January 1, the year 2001, but not prior to 180 days from enactment--the Secretary and the Governor of Montana will negotiate with the understanding that the Federal Government owes them $10 million in mineral resources for the loss of the New World Mine; is that essentially correct?
Dale Bumpers: “With regard to the payment to the State of Montana, there is a provision in this bill--and I will not read the whole…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a provision in a bill related to payments owed to Montana for mineral resources.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
The ozone layer protects us from the ultraviolet rays of the Sun. The hole that we have already caused is going to cause thousands and thousands of cases of skin cancer before we even begin to stabilize the ozone layer. Mr. President, I…
The reason there is an objection is because the Senator from New Hampshire and the Senator from Oregon do not come from the 45 States that have sales taxes. They are opposed to this because their State is not one of the 45 States that do…
I want to suggest to each Senator that they meditate on this proposition. The doorbell rings and the Senator's wife answers the door. There is a nicely dressed person, in a suit and tie, standing at the door. He hands her a paper, and she…
I have lost this amendment several times. As you have heard me say previously, this is the seventh or eighth year that I have offered this proposal. Every year the specious, absolutely false arguments are made that people don't want any…





