Senator, I think that in the case of your beloved daughter, you would be quite secure if she came home with a gift of almost any value--well, I will not say that--but of nominal value, say, $20. You could be secure in that because there is an exemption for those "motivated by personal or family relationships." If she came home with something from school, that would certainly be a personal relationship.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing exemptions related to gifts in a legislative context.
Share
More from Dale Bumpers
As I have said, and this sounds a little self-serving, but I say it again, in the 19-plus years I have been in the Senate, that is the only time, about 9 o'clock that evening, on the Manassas battlefield bill that Senators have actually…
I will give you an illustration of how that works. Betty's father died in 1986. He was not a wealthy man, but he was not poor. He left her land and money, and in the following year my assets went up rather substantially on my ethics…
I am being a devil's advocate on that. Obviously, I am not going to let somebody bring that many gifts to my office. I am talking about possibilities.
My judgment may be wrong, and the Ethics Committee may say, ``Senator, are you telling me that you thought it was reasonable to take a bottle of wine from 20 different people on 5 different occasions each for a total of 100 bottles?''





