So he testified that they'd already been working with NatureServe. When the assessment came along, they just took the work they'd already done and made that part of the assessment.
Bruce Westerman: “So he testified that they'd already been working with NatureServe. When the assessment came along, they just took the…”
Editor's note · Context
Westerman questions the EPA's use of prior work for the watershed assessment.
Share
More from Bruce Westerman
I point out that, while the current administration did recently rescind the 2024 rule this month, passage of a CRA is still necessary to prevent a future administration from, again, weaponizing IAPs similar to this one that ignore…
as we wrap up today on this final RMP, I include in the Record this GAO report that found that the RMP is subject to the CRA. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, June 25, 2025. Matter of U.S. Department of the Interior…
Mr. Speaker, there are a lot of similarities on both sides of the aisle, but there is a big difference. The similarities are that I think both sides of the aisle support geothermal energy. It is similar that we talk about inflation and…
the Navajo Transitional Energy Company is the third largest coal producer in the United States and operates three mines in the Powder River Basin. They were strongly opposed to the previous RMP amendment and support this CRA to ``preserve…





