On the recordMarch 15, 2001
I rise to support my very good friend, the Senator from California, who is one of the strongest advocates on behalf of women and children in our entire country. I do so because I find myself in agreement that there is some confusion about the meaning and application of this provision. That certainly should be clarified before we move to a vote on the underlying legislation. As the Senator has so eloquently stated, we are making a dramatic change in both cutting the amount and the period of time for which a debtor would be held accountable with respect to any luxury goods or services. I urge that we adopt the amendment of the Senator from California because I believe it is reasonable for existing law to have the amount and the time period.
Source
govinfo.gov




