01/09/1994
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu...
"These funds should remain in the CSRD because they represent assets used to provide survivorship protection to judges."
"This provision could appear to represent a conflict of interest for the Judiciary."
"Giving contempt authority to non-Article III judges raises constitutional concerns."
"Any bill that would increase mandatory spending or result in a net revenue loss could contribute to a sequester of mandatory programs as called for in the Budget Enforcement Act."