On the recordNovember 8, 1996
I could have made it closer, maybe. [Laughter] I don't know. I'm concerned about it, you know, and there are all kinds of--there are explanations you read which may be reassuring, like, ``Well, when times are pretty good people maybe not vote;'' and explanations you read which are discouraging, ``The more the negative ads are, the lower the turnout is.'' And I saw a very disturbing--one of you on the television--I saw a series the other night about how local campaigns were now becoming also dominated by negative ads. Let me make a suggestion and say that I do not know the answer to it. I was elated at the enormous turnout in 1992. I felt good about it. But we had signals that this election would be a lower turnout election quite a long while before we had the turnout. And the first indication I had for sure was when the viewership of the debates was so much lower than it was the year before. And you know, we got all our folks together and I said, ``We're going to have a hard time getting our folks to the polls, and we need to really work on this.'' So let me just throw it back to you and say that I would welcome any analysis anyone has about what we can do to get voting up. I strongly supported motor voter and other attempts to increase the registration base, thinking that that would increase the turnout. We have dramatically increased the number of people who are registered; there's been a huge increase in registration in the last 4 years. And I'm disappointed it wasn't accompanied by an increase in voting. If you've got any more ideas--I saw Senator Feinstein on television saying that if we had a uniform poll closing, that that would increase turnout in the Western States. I wish I had a good opinion on it, but I'm open to doing something that will increase it if you all have any good ideas. Yes. Press Secretary Mike McCurry. Last question, please.
Source
govinfo.gov




