Bill Clinton: “Both. Yes, that is, I think that based on what I've seen, it captures the rhetoric, and it's very flattering in a way…”

“Both. Yes, that is, I think that based on what I've seen, it captures the rhetoric, and it's very flattering in a way, you know? Because it replicates the rhetoric. But I think--and it, on some issues, seems to have discarded some of the harsher aspects of the Republican revolution of the last 5 years, immigration, for example. But on other issues, it's either blurring, like, where are they, really, on affirmative action and choice--not really clear--and on some places, you know, downright hostile to the position that I believe is sort of the Third Way position, including on civil liberties, like the hate crimes legislation or on consumer protections like the Patients' Bill of Rights or, most profoundly, on these gun issues. So the question is, are the architects of the revolution in 1995, the contract on America, the heirs of Newt Gingrich who are still basically in control of the Congress, all of whom were early--almost all of whom, almost 100 percent--early endorsers of Mr. Bush, is this an umbrella under which they can be protected from the rainstorm of public opinion until they get to where they can do what they want, or is it something different? I think the record is decidedly mixed on that. Childhood Poverty Mr. Brownstein. I was going to ask you about Bradley criticizing you on child poverty, not doing enough to reduce childhood poverty. That was the----”