I think what we need, during the course of the debate on this bill, is the kind of careful analysis that Professor Gramm brings to this issue. I think as Members of the Senate actually read this bill, as the American people hear the contents of the bill and hear the kind of passionate expression and concern for a Patients' Bill of Rights in general, it will give way to concern about the impact that the bill itself would have. So the Senator from Texas called it bait and switch. It could also be called the exceptions swallow the rule. Let me review some of those examples where the exception swallows the rule. On page 35 of the bill, paragraph (C), ``No coverage for excluded benefits.'' The point in that very plain statement is that the contract is to be sacred. It is to be honored. The contract means what it says.
Asa Hutchinson: “I think what we need, during the course of the debate on this bill, is the kind of careful analysis that Professor Gramm…”
On the recordJune 21, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a Patients' Bill of Rights during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Asa Hutchinson
Jun 30, 2022
I would not be supporting him for 2024. He acted irresponsibly. During that time, he was a risk to the nation, absolutely.
Aug 6, 2026
Well, facts change and leaders have to adjust to the new facts that you have and the reality of what you have to deal with.
Jul 31, 2023
Well, it's another sad day for America when a former president is indicted, particularly dealing with the lawful transfer of power from one administration to another administration.
Mar 30, 2023
Well, I think that's the analysis that in the short term, people believe he has been targeted, believes that the prosecution is not just and the charges are not valid.





