It has been years since this body voted on the most-favored-nation status for China. It has been 8 years since the Tiananmen Square massacre, and it has been 4 years since this Nation embarked on a policy of so-called constructive engagement which delinked our China trade policy from human rights concerns. During these years, years since we last voted on MFN, years since the Tiananmen Square massacre, and the 4 years since we embarked upon constructive engagement, this is what has happened in these years: The struggling democracy movement in China has been thoroughly and completely squashed. Those students at Tiananmen Square, which we watched on television all over this Nation, are all either imprisoned or executed. All voices of freedom in China have since been silenced--all of them--according to the 1996 State Department Report on China. All voices of dissidents have been silenced. Chinese workers have been systematically exploited. Weapons of mass destruction have been exported around the world so that the export of those weapons from China now poses the greatest military risk in the world today. And people of faith in China have been persecuted and driven underground.
Asa Hutchinson: “It has been years since this body voted on the most-favored-nation status for China. It has been 8 years since the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the status of human rights and democracy in China during a discussion on most-favored-nation status.
Share
More from Asa Hutchinson
I would not be supporting him for 2024. He acted irresponsibly. During that time, he was a risk to the nation, absolutely.
Whenever you look at the rule of law, which I talked about, the challenge of crime in our cities, the challenge of border security, that's where we simply need to enforce the law, and that is the background that I bring to this campaign.
We have to come together so we can then get the important work done of looking at the border security issue, to looking at controlling federal spending that's adding to inflation.
We should not underestimate the challenge of this. I think this is Kevin McCarthy's point, that you have an element of speech here of a candidate addressing a rally.





