on behalf of the rural States in mid- America, I speak in favor of the Ehlers-Hunter amendment for a number of reasons. First, the status quo funding of the NEA results not in art education, but in art arrogance. Do we really need a centralized, federalized ministry on the arts to tell the people of America what is good and what is not good art, what does and does not deserve funding? Second, the present philosophy of the NEA does not accomplish its original mission of providing art education to underserved areas; not the big cities, but underserved areas. Rather, Washington control results in mismanagement and a lack of common sense in art funding. The Ehlers amendment gets the money to the State art agencies, which do a good job, and it also for the first time provides funding for art programs in schools. I urge my colleagues to support a commonsense approach to arts by voting for art education and not art arrogance.
Asa Hutchinson: “on behalf of the rural States in mid- America, I speak in favor of the Ehlers-Hunter amendment for a number of reasons.…”
Editor's note · Context
Speaking in favor of the Ehlers-Hunter amendment regarding funding for the National Endowment for the Arts.
Share
More from Asa Hutchinson
It's wrong the position he's taken. And I think it's important for the leaders of our party to be clear on this issue, that we don't sympathize with Donald Trump and his mocking of the case, but yet we treat it with seriousness as it…
I am running for the president of the United States because I know that the best of America is ahead of us.
I think abortion may be on the backburner by the time you know, the 2024 really heats up.
It's just wrong to undermine our justice system. It's one of the hallmarks of our democracy that we have a strong rule of law and that any person who is aggrieved can go into court and seek justice.





