There was an article on the front page of the Washington Post on Monday, and it says, ``Oil money is fueling Sudan's war''. It goes on to say that Arab is killing non-Arab or African and Muslims are killing Christians. But one thing is in common, and that is that, and it says, Nile Blend crude is fueling this entire war. It talks about the four oil companies that are in Sudan drilling for oil, turning the proceeds of that development over to the government. The government is hiring guns and arms and airplanes and helicopter gunships, and they are bombing the people of Sudan. The quote in that article is the fighting follows the oil. If you can stop the oil revenue, you have a chance at stopping the fighting. That is exactly what this amendment does.
Spencer Bachus: “There was an article on the front page of the Washington Post on Monday, and it says, ``Oil money is fueling Sudan's…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of oil revenue on the conflict in Sudan during a debate on the Foreign Relations Authorization Act.
Share
More from Spencer Bachus
However, my continued concern is that the program threatens to dry up legitimate sources of credit and financing.
I think maybe listening to everyone on the panel, I think, and most of the Members on the dais, we all agree that our country, its citizens, and even our immigrants need comprehensive immigration reform.
The program also can deny legitimate merchants access to financial networks they need to survive.
My Democratic colleagues have said they want to wrap this up. So let me just simply say to you that this is having the effect of shutting down these companies, whether that was intended or not.





