One would not think there would be such an uproar from the other side because, in fact, the bill we passed exempts 3 million-plus low-income workers from any Federal tax liability. But there is still an uproar. It increases the child tax credit from $600 to $1,000. But there is still an uproar. It actually gives back, and only in Washington could you give back a tax refund above what people pay in, but it actually gives back $2,000 more to low-income families with children than they paid in; yet there is still an uproar. Why the uproar? Because the other side wants to take tax money, taxpayers' money that was paid in, and pay it back to people who did not pay taxes. In other words, an individual paying in $1,500 ought to get back $3,500. Well, let me tell my colleagues that there is only one problem with that, and that is who pays the $2,000? The answer is the middle class. In Alabama, if my colleagues talk to my constituents and say to them that they are going to pay back $2,000 to people who did not pay taxes, with their tax dollars, because they have children, they are going to call that welfare. And that is exactly what it is.
On the recordJune 5, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a recently passed tax cut during a floor speech.
Share
More from Spencer Bachus
Apr 2, 2014
I cannot stand by and support legislation that would dismantle government and a century of progress under the guise of symmetrical enforcement.
Dec 1, 2014
I think maybe listening to everyone on the panel, I think, and most of the Members on the dais, we all agree that our country, its citizens, and even our immigrants need comprehensive immigration reform.
Jun 23, 2014
I just want to make a statement about Government investment in infrastructure, the space program, the hundreds of millions of dollars that the Federal Government, through taxpayer money, spent to prepare to turn that industry over to the…





