I would like to affirm the understanding between the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Oxley) and the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank). In this bill we built upon the amendments that the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. LaTourette) and the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Hooley) had first offered along with the gentleman from New York (Mr. Ackerman) and also the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank) to flesh out existing uniform standards. The bill of the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. LaTourette) and the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Hooley) that we used as our base text expanded on the uniform standards for identity theft. But in that bill, as in ours, there is no intent to go beyond the specific subjects identified in the bill. So, for example, we do create uniform standards for opening new credit accounts when there are allegations of potential identity theft under our fraud alert and blocking provisions. Because you need a consistent rule that consumers and businesses can rely on when there has been a fraud alert, when there has been an allegation of identity theft. We do not address other subject matters that are not covered such as limits on Social Security number use or criminal penalties for identifying theft perpetrators. These are issues that we expect the States to continue to work out solutions to.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the provisions of a bill related to identity theft and uniform standards.
Share
More from Spencer Bachus
This is a very straightforward amendment, which I am joined by my colleague, Ms. Terri Sewell, in offering. The chief judge of the Northern District of Alabama, Karon Bowdre, and the U.S. marshal who was appointed under the previous…
Wouldn't it be a better approach to say, 'Take all that out, and then send it to us?'
My Democratic colleagues have said they want to wrap this up. So let me just simply say to you that this is having the effect of shutting down these companies, whether that was intended or not.
When you give us assurances that you are not going to use this information, like personally identifiable information, all we really have to go on is that in the Federal Register, your agency has asked permission to collect all this…





