Mr. Chairman, as one of the original authors of the first TRIA legislation back in 2002, which passed this House with a strong vote, and also as a supporter of the extension in 2005, which I also cosponsored, I am disappointed that I have to rise today in opposition to the present bill. But I do so sincerely. The whole idea of TRIA, the 2002 bill, the 2005 extension, was to create a short-term government backstop which would allow the insurance industry, the private market to adjust to the 9/11 reality. By any objective measure, people on both sides of the aisle have said TRIA has been a success. Secretary Hank Paulson supported a TRIA which was a government backstop as the government continued to process the stepping back. The terrorist insurance markets have stabilized. Policyholders are requesting and they are receiving coverage. Prices have declined. Reinsurance has become more available. The private marketplace is diversifying, and it is absorbing additional risk exposure every day.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the current bill related to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) during a House debate.
Share
More from Spencer Bachus
I thank the gentleman from Virginia. They actually called for us to have this procedure. And that part of Dodd-Frank--I have sometimes said ``the good, the bad, and the ugly''-- that was a good part. We needed to structure bankruptcy where…
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made…
The program also can deny legitimate merchants access to financial networks they need to survive.
But in fact in 4 it says, documents sufficient to identify payment processors or merchants or clients that experienced a return rate of 3 percent or greater in any 1-month period.





