I would like to thank the gentlewoman for yielding, and as someone who served as ranking member for this subcommittee back several years ago, I just want to express my support and the work for the Open World Leadership Center than the opposed amendment offered by the gentleman from Texas. I am sure it is well intended, but I do want to say that I think that this amendment is not going in the right direction. We do need to keep this partnership. It is a partnership. It is a relationship that has developed with these former Soviet countries. I think it is very important. It has served us well. It is a program that a lot of people say is duplicated in other agencies of government, but I will say it is unique. It is a unique approach to working across borders to highlight the critical role of the legislative branch in emerging democracies. I just want to say that I support this bill as it currently is and would oppose the gentleman's amendment.
On the recordMay 19, 2015
Share
More from Robert Aderholt
Mar 19, 2024
I think we are spending it in the right place, but I think there are some places where it is not being used very efficiently.
Jun 3, 2024
In honor of the upcoming 80th anniversary of D-day, I rise to share the words of Motor Mechanic Mate First Class Paul Hudson Atkins of Sheffield, Alabama, in Alabama's Fourth Congressional District. He was one of the first wave of soldiers…
Apr 10, 2024
I'm very, very concerned about this rescheduling and it is just very disconcerting to hear this.
Sep 28, 2023
I thank the gentlewoman for the time to speak on this. Mr. Chair, I do rise in opposition to the amendment. I thank my colleague, Mr. Diaz-Balart, for his leadership on this bill. While certainly I don't think any of us want to send…





