I do rise in opposition to the amendment of my colleague from Georgia. The recommendation in this amendment provides $350 million for Legal Services, which is a reduction to 2008 level of almost $70 million. It is $80 million below the 2010 request. I understand there are some concerns with Legal Services Corporation- funded programs, but the bill contains several important restrictions on political activity by the LSC grantees. That would include lobbying, abortion litigation, and class action lawsuits. These restrictions cover both the Legal Services funds as well as private funds. The administration proposed to eliminate several of these restrictions, but the House bill rejects this proposal. We have included language in the committee report directing Legal Services to vigorously enforce the restrictions on political activity, which we think is very important. Throughout my time in Congress, I have supported Legal Services for Americans who would not otherwise have adequate access to civil legal assistance. We are facing an extremely challenging budgetary environment--and I realize that--but the recommendation is a fair compromise between the need for austerity and also the balance to provide civil legal assistance to low-income Americans. For that reason, Madam Chair, I would urge a ``no'' vote. I reserve the balance of my time.
On the recordMay 29, 2014
Share
More from Robert Aderholt
Mar 19, 2024
this cancel culture mentality is a real issue out there, and I think it is something that needs to be addressed
Dec 17, 2024
The Bible has been and, really, it still is more than just a book. It is the foundation of our moral compass. It is the inspiration behind our laws. It is the source of strength and comfort for countless families and individuals, literally…
Dec 17, 2024
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, first of all, I thank my colleague, Congressman Lamborn, for once again organizing this important Special Order, as he has done many times in the past. Not only that, but I thank him for his…
Apr 10, 2024
What steps is the Bureau of Prisons taking to address gaps in correctional officer and training--and leader training?





