I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: an amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law imposes additional duties. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any Member wish to be heard on the gentleman's point of order?
Share
More from Robert Aderholt
What steps is the Bureau of Prisons taking to address gaps in correctional officer and training--and leader training?
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, first of all, I thank my colleague, Congressman Lamborn, for once again organizing this important Special Order, as he has done many times in the past. Not only that, but I thank him for his…
I am concerned that some in the administration have decided to weaponize the FBI and its resources against pro-life Americans.
I'm very, very concerned about this rescheduling and it is just very disconcerting to hear this.
Other voices in this conversation
