Let me just reiterate again that the gentleman's proposed cuts just go too far. They would undoubtedly cut and harm border security, transportation security, maritime security, cargo security, cybersecurity, immigration enforcement, and disaster preparedness. The list of crucial programs that would be adversely impacted by this across-the-board amendment goes on and on. I would urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Aderholt is opposing proposed budget cuts that he believes would harm national security and essential services.
Share
More from Robert Aderholt
Representing one of the more rural congressional districts in America has taught me that where a person lives should never determine the quality of healthcare they receive or the opportunities available to them.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, first of all, I thank my colleague, Congressman Lamborn, for once again organizing this important Special Order, as he has done many times in the past. Not only that, but I thank him for his…
The Administration has the duty to enforce the law without prejudice to political philosophy or those in violation of the law.
Of course, back on October 7 of last year, we all know what happened, and along with the attack on Israel, there were 30 Americans that were killed by Hamas terrorists in Israel, as part of a larger coordinated attack that left 1200…
Other voices in this conversation
