Let me just reiterate again that the gentleman's proposed cuts just go too far. They would undoubtedly cut and harm border security, transportation security, maritime security, cargo security, cybersecurity, immigration enforcement, and disaster preparedness. The list of crucial programs that would be adversely impacted by this across-the-board amendment goes on and on. I would urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Aderholt is opposing proposed budget cuts that he believes would harm national security and essential services.
Share
More from Robert Aderholt
I rise today here on the House floor of the United States House of Representatives to recognize an extraordinary American and a dear personal friend, Mr. Roy Drinkard of Cullman, Alabama, who just celebrated his 105th birthday this past…
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume, and I rise to support another amendment in the en bloc. This is the Congressman Gottheimer's amendment with regard to safe school drinking…
I am concerned that some in the administration have decided to weaponize the FBI and its resources against pro-life Americans.
Of course, back on October 7 of last year, we all know what happened, and along with the attack on Israel, there were 30 Americans that were killed by Hamas terrorists in Israel, as part of a larger coordinated attack that left 1200…





