I regret that I, too, must oppose the amendment offered by the Senator from Missouri, amendment No. 4986. Senator Bond's amendment would specifically undermine the goal of protecting the American taxpayer from the costs of the HOPE Program. I have often said--and I will repeat once again--that we should do whatever we can to help people stay in their homes short of sticking taxpayers with the tab. The Banking Committee has worked long and hard for months on this issue and has found a way to accommodate a wide range of goals and concerns with this legislation. The affordable housing fund and the funding mechanism--which is important here--for the HOPE Program are two of the most critical elements that allowed us to reach a bipartisan agreement. Eliminating either one of these now would simply unwind the entire bill, would destroy the whole bill, and neither I nor Senator Dodd nor a lot of our colleagues on both sides of the aisle can support that. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to join us in opposing the first Bond amendment.
Richard Shelby: “I regret that I, too, must oppose the amendment offered by the Senator from Missouri, amendment No. 4986. Senator Bond's…”
On the recordJune 19, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing amendments related to the HOPE Program during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Richard Shelby
May 2, 2022
In a fiscal environment with 8.5 percent inflation, the Department's budget request equates to a cut to our national defense at a time of unprecedented security risks.
May 9, 2022
In the area of hypersonics, General, I'll address this to you, we're all pleased to learn that the Army will field its first hypersonic battery in 2023, but we all are concerned and have been a long time about the progress that China and…
May 25, 2022
I am concerned about this--what this communicates to both our allies and our adversaries.
May 9, 2022
With inflation at the highest levels we've seen in 40 years, the request represents a cut from the 2022 level.





