On the recordJuly 13, 2009
Shouldn't the language require that the real benefits must outweigh real costs to consumers and covered persons instead of that?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Shelby questions the vagueness of the proposal's language regarding consumer benefits.
Share
More from Richard Shelby
May 2, 2022
At the same time, North Korea is testing missiles reportedly capable of carrying nuclear warheads.
May 25, 2022
We have got to get our arms, one, around the inflation first, and then try to boost our defense capabilities in a dangerous world.
Sep 12, 2022
I am pleased this afternoon to commend Mr. Francisco J. Collazo of Grant, AL, for his contributions to our great country and to the State of Alabama. Born in 1931 in Puerto Rico, Mr. Collazo joined the Army at 15 years of age. He had an…
Aug 6, 2022
I call up my amendment No. 5418 and ask that it be reported by number. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Alabama [Mr. Shelby] proposes an amendment numbered 5418 to…
Other voices in this conversation
