On the recordJuly 13, 2009
Shouldn't the language require that the real benefits must outweigh real costs to consumers and covered persons instead of that?
Source
congress.govRichard Shelby: “Shouldn't the language require that the real benefits must outweigh real costs to consumers and covered persons instead…”
Editor's note · Context
Shelby questions the vagueness of the proposal's language regarding consumer benefits.
Share
More from Richard Shelby
May 25, 2022
A lot of people, including this Senator, believe that the request is not enough considering the problems in the world.
Feb 28, 2023
As Senator Shelby at our Senate testimony hearing last March pointed out to us, we must maintain what we have before we can build new, and I think he hits the mark head-on.
May 25, 2022
Deterrence requires spending our limited resources on both offensive and defensive weapons.
May 25, 2022
We have got to get our arms, one, around the inflation first, and then try to boost our defense capabilities in a dangerous world.
Other voices in this conversation
