As chairman of the Strategic Forces Subcommittee, I understand that the responsiveness and distributed nature of our ICBMs are their most critical feature and their unique contribution to our nuclear triad. Without ICBMs, an adversary would only need to strike less than 10 targets to disarm our nuclear forces. With ICBMs, an adversary needs to strike hundreds of hardened targets deep in the American homeland. That is a much more difficult proposition and is at the very heart of deterrence. This is not a parochial issue or a political issue. This is a profound national security issue. De-alerting our ICBMs or unilaterally cutting their numbers is a terrible idea. I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this amendment.
Share
More from Mike Rogers
Even Donald Trump said, I was tough but fair. I'll take that all day long. We're going to have differences amongst our party members all the time.
I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the motion. The text of the motion is as follows: Mr. Rogers of Alabama moves that the House concur in the Senate amendment to the bill, H.R. 5009, with an…
They are encouraging a lot of people to get worked up to cross that line between what would be normal political discourse into radical, aggressive political behavior, including attempted murder, which you just saw in the UFC fights.
The President has it exactly right: now is the time for America to demonstrate our resolve against Russian aggression.





