Okay. General Kehler, is there a 'reduced scope' option that meets minimum military requirements and costs less than the B61-12 design that is currently being pursued in this LEP?
Editor's note · Context
Rogers questions the feasibility of a lower-cost nuclear option.
Share
More from Mike Rogers
I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the motion. The text of the motion is as follows: Mr. Rogers of Alabama moves that the House concur in the Senate amendment to the bill, H.R. 5009, with an…
I think we lost the Georgia two Republican Senate seats because of Donald Trump and his chaotic leadership style.
I have one additional speaker. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Arrington).
I strongly support requiring all of our NATO allies to meet their 2 percent obligation, but arbitrarily cutting off funding to NATO with a war raging in Eastern Europe and Putin threatening us with nuclear weapons is absolutely the wrong…





