On the recordJuly 10, 2013
I urge the House to support the Turner-Rogers- Franks-Bridenstine amendment. The New START treaty is perhaps the first unilateral arms control treaty the U.S. has ratified in that it is the first treaty where only the U.S. has to make reductions in the central limits of the treaty. Every six months new data is released by the Department of State showing that only the U.S. is reducing its deployed nuclear forces to implement this treaty. Last month, in Berlin, the President announced that he was changing the Nuclear Weapons Employment Guidance and Strategy of the United States to support further reductions in United States nuclear forces. Never before has a President done something like this. Yes, Presidents since Truman have updated the nation's nuclear war plan. But there is no precedent for a President to tell the national security team that, regardless of the nuclear weapons modernization programs of China, Russia, Pakistan, North Korea and others, the U.S. should plan to reduce our nuclear forces. Every other President has asked one simple question when conducting a review like this: what level of nuclear forces do I need to ensure that a potential enemy or adversary knows that if he attacks the United States or our allies, we will have the ability to respond with nuclear forces that could result in nothing less than total devastation? It has not been explained to me how fewer nuclear weapons in the U.S. nuclear deterrent is necessarily better for the country's security.…
Source
govinfo.gov




