In response to the gentleman's comments that he just made, it is well worth repeating: this bill actually strengthens protections for workers and increases penalties for abuse. It contains in it strong anticoercion provisions. We have to be factual about what is actually in the bill. This bill prohibits an employer from directly or indirectly, as suggested by the gentleman, trying to intimidate or coerce workers. Employers found to have coerced employees would be liable to those employees for double damages. Of course, in response to the previous statements, all existing enforcement remedies, including action by the U.S. Department of Labor, are available to workers if an employer failed to pay cash wages for overtime hours or unreasonably refuses to allow workers to use their accrued comp time. {time} 1630
Martha Roby: “In response to the gentleman's comments that he just made, it is well worth repeating: this bill actually strengthens…”
Share
More from Martha Roby
I was unable to vote on Friday, July 24 due to a family medical emergency. Had I been present I would have voted as follows: ``nay'' on rollcall No. 162, ``nay'' on rollcall No. 163, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 164, ``yea'' on rollcall No…
To close. Mr. Speaker, first, we need to make clear that this bill does not expand law to go after teenagers for sexting. Under present law, technically, such changes may be possible. However, we know of no instance where the Department of…
Just over a month ago, Hurricane Michael, the third most powerful hurricane to ever make landfall on the United States mainland, ravaged areas of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Hundreds of Americans lost everything, and more than 30 people…
I would like to include in the Record a letter from the Judicial Conference of the United States voicing their opposition and concerns to H.R. 8235, the Open Courts Act of 2020. Judicial Conference of the United States, Washington, DC…





