Mr. President, I support this important amendment, to put a halt to the Bush administration's disrespectful and disturbing treatment of the lives of America's seniors in setting environmental policy. It is unconscionable that the administration continues to push agencies to evaluate pollution-control proposals on the basis of the age of the individuals who are protected. Judging people as less worth protecting based on their age--and to do so for the benefit of polluters--is preposterous and wrong. Despite statements by administration officials aimed to quiet protest over the 'senior death discount' factor --a factor used by the Environmental Protection Agency in recent regulatory cost-benefit analyses that literally devalues the lives of Americans 70 and older-- the administration continues to push agencies to apply economic techniques for evaluating pollution-control proposals on the basis of the life expectancies of the individuals protected, slanting the analysis against the elderly who, of course, have fewer years left.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the treatment of seniors in environmental policy during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Julian Bond
This final amendment limits the responsibility of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for housing entities that receive funding from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund created under the bill. The amendment prohibits the trust fund to be used for…
I rise to introduce the Limitations on Interrogation Techniques Act of 2009. This bill is identical to one I introduced last summer, along with Senators Hatch, Chambliss, Burr, and Warner. Last week, my colleague and good friend on the…
Of course, it is exactly the same. It's a right that all Americans have and no reason why gay and lesbian people ought not to have these rights too. These are universal rights.





