In addition to the story about the people coming in with ballots from who knows where, an even more interesting series of facts was unearthed in a study by Portland State University professor Melody Rose who did work assessing the potential for fraud and coercion in Oregon's mail-in voting. Her preliminary data is quite revealing. This is a sample, not exact, but she said 5 percent of voters in Oregon had someone else mark their ballot; 2.5 percent of voters had someone else sign their ballots; 4 percent of voters either signed or marked someone else's ballot. In a State such as Oregon with about 1.6 million ballots cast in 2000, those percentages could equate to fairly high numbers. If the preliminary data were to hold up across the entire population, that might mean 80,000 voters had someone else mark their ballots, 40,000 voters had someone illegally sign, and 64,000 voters signed or marked someone else's ballot. I am not comforted by the assertions that Oregon has everything under control and thus should be exempt from antifraud protections in this bill.
On the recordFebruary 26, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing potential voter fraud in Oregon's mail-in voting system.
Share
More from Julian Bond
Jun 19, 2008
A couple of months ago, we passed a good bill to say we would authorize $10 million for State housing finance agencies to help refinance homes where the owners were facing foreclosure. A good approach. This is a disastrous approach. CBO…
Mar 28, 2012
It's the most -- one of the most cynical things I've ever heard of or seen spelled out in this way.
Feb 9, 2009
these last few days, I have been traveling across my State of Missouri, and to say that people are outraged over this $1 trillion budget buster would be an understatement. Unfortunately, many of the people have called the office and talked…





